Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°ú¿ë ÄÞÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A Study on the Radiopacity of Dental Compomers

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±âÀçÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 26±Ç 1È£ p.11 ~ 16
À±¼÷Áø, ±èÀº°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±¼÷Áø (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀº°æ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é ¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
Ä¡°ú¿ë ¼öº¹ Àç·áÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀº ¼öº¹¹°ÀÌ Àû´çÇÑ°¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í 2Â÷ ¿ì½ÄÀ»
¹ß°ßÇϸç, ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ º¯¿¬, overhang, ±âÆ÷ µîÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ°í ½Ç¼ö·Î »ïÄÑ ¹ö¸° ¼öº¹¹°À» ¹ß°ßÇÒ
¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Ä¡¾Æ ³»¿¡ ¼öº¹µÇ´Â Àç·á´Â ÀûÁ¤ÇÑ Á¤µµ·Î ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ
°ú¼ºÀ̾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
½ÃÆǵǰí ÀÖ´Â Ä¡°ú¿ë ÄÞÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀ», ÈæÈ­µµ°è¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ¹ý°ú ¹æ»ç¼± »ç
ÁøÀ» µðÁöÅÐÈ­ÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ±× È­»óÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý µî µÎ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ¼öº¹¿ë ±Û¶ó½º
¾ÆÀÌ¿À³ë¸Ó ¹× Ä¡°ú¿ë ·ÕÆ÷ÁþÆ®·¹Áø°ú ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÈæÈ­µµ°è·Î ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú FL°ú DR, CG¿Í ZH¸¸ ¼­·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ
¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í ´Ù¸¥ Àç·á ¹× Ä¡ÁúÀº °¢±â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
2. ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀÇ È­»óÀ» µðÁöÅÐÈ­ ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼­µµ FL°ú DR, CG¿Í ZH¸¸ ¼­·Î
À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í ´Ù¸¥ Àç·á ¹× Ä¡ÁúÀº °¢±â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
3. µÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼­ °¢ Àç·áº°·Î µÎ ¹æ¹ý°£ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í(p>0.05)´Ù¸¸
Ä¡ÁúÀÇ °æ¿ì ¹ý¶ûÁúÀº ¾à°£, »ó¾ÆÁúÀº ²ö Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The Objective of this study is to measure and compare the radiopacities of dental
compomers with those glass ionomer and dental composite resin and to compare
radiographic densitometry with indirect digital
Disks of two different dental compomers(DR and CG) as the experimental group, one
resin-reinforced and one composite resin(ZH) as the control group, 10mm in diameter
and 2mm thick were radiographed teeth and aluminum stepwedge standard. Radiopacity
was evaluated by transmission densitometry and with program following the digitization
of the radiographs using a flatbed scanner with transparency unit.
All material and tooth structure showed the significant difference except FL and DR,
CG and ZH(p<0.05) by the densitometric evaluation. And all material and tooth structure
also showed the significant difference except FL and DR, CG and ZH(p<0.05) by
indirect digital image analysis. Two evaluation methods didn't show the difference
among the materials, but showed the difference between enamel radiopacities and
between dentin radiopacities.

Å°¿öµå

aluminum stepwedge; densitometer; digital image analysis; radiopacity;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI