Ä¡°ú¿ë ÄÞÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
A Study on the Radiopacity of Dental Compomers
À±¼÷Áø, ±èÀº°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±¼÷Áø ( ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀº°æ ( ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é ¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
KMID : 0362219990260010011
Abstract
°á·Ð
Ä¡°ú¿ë ¼öº¹ Àç·áÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀº ¼öº¹¹°ÀÌ Àû´çÇÑ°¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í 2Â÷ ¿ì½ÄÀ»
¹ß°ßÇϸç, ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ º¯¿¬, overhang, ±âÆ÷ µîÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ°í ½Ç¼ö·Î »ïÄÑ ¹ö¸° ¼öº¹¹°À» ¹ß°ßÇÒ
¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ Ä¡¾Æ ³»¿¡ ¼öº¹µÇ´Â Àç·á´Â ÀûÁ¤ÇÑ Á¤µµ·Î ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ
°ú¼ºÀ̾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
½ÃÆǵǰí ÀÖ´Â Ä¡°ú¿ë ÄÞÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀ», Èæȵµ°è¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ¹ý°ú ¹æ»ç¼± »ç
ÁøÀ» µðÁöÅÐÈÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ±× È»óÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý µî µÎ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ¼öº¹¿ë ±Û¶ó½º
¾ÆÀÌ¿À³ë¸Ó ¹× Ä¡°ú¿ë ·ÕÆ÷ÁþÆ®·¹Áø°ú ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Èæȵµ°è·Î ¹æ»ç¼± ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú FL°ú DR, CG¿Í ZH¸¸ ¼·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ
¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í ´Ù¸¥ Àç·á ¹× Ä¡ÁúÀº °¢±â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
2. ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀÇ È»óÀ» µðÁöÅÐÈ ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼µµ FL°ú DR, CG¿Í ZH¸¸ ¼·Î
À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í ´Ù¸¥ Àç·á ¹× Ä¡ÁúÀº °¢±â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
3. µÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼ °¢ Àç·áº°·Î µÎ ¹æ¹ý°£ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í(p>0.05)´Ù¸¸
Ä¡ÁúÀÇ °æ¿ì ¹ý¶ûÁúÀº ¾à°£, »ó¾ÆÁúÀº ²ö Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The Objective of this study is to measure and compare the radiopacities of dental
compomers with those glass ionomer and dental composite resin and to compare
radiographic densitometry with indirect digital
Disks of two different dental compomers(DR and CG) as the experimental group, one
resin-reinforced and one composite resin(ZH) as the control group, 10mm in diameter
and 2mm thick were radiographed teeth and aluminum stepwedge standard. Radiopacity
was evaluated by transmission densitometry and with program following the digitization
of the radiographs using a flatbed scanner with transparency unit.
All material and tooth structure showed the significant difference except FL and DR,
CG and ZH(p<0.05) by the densitometric evaluation. And all material and tooth structure
also showed the significant difference except FL and DR, CG and ZH(p<0.05) by
indirect digital image analysis. Two evaluation methods didn't show the difference
among the materials, but showed the difference between enamel radiopacities and
between dentin radiopacities.
Å°¿öµå
aluminum stepwedge; densitometer; digital image analysis; radiopacity;
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸